IPv4
From $0.72 for 1 pc. 40 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
IPv4
From $0.72 for 1 pc. 40 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
IPv4
From $0.72 for 1 pc. 40 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
IPv6
From $0.07 for 1 pc. 14 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
ISP
From $1.35 for 1 pc. 24 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
Mobile
From $14 for 1 pc. 14 countries to choose from, rental period from 2 days.
Resident
From $0.70 for 1 GB. 200+ countries to choose from, rental period from 30 days.
Use cases:
Use cases:
Tools:
Company:
About Us:
As privacy requirements and the demand for stable connections continue to grow, more users and organizations are paying attention to specialized solutions such as ISP vs residential proxies. These two types are often used for tasks where reliability, confidentiality, and high throughput are crucial – from web scraping and SEO monitoring to bypassing restrictions and automating processes in social media.
This guide will help clarify the differences between these types, explain how each works, and, based on practical comparisons, help you select the most suitable option for your specific requirements and goals.
They are static IP addresses registered to real ISP networks but physically hosted on datacenter servers. These addresses are provided by ISPs to licensed hosting companies, combining two key advantages: legitimacy and high performance.
Unlike standard datacenter servers, for example IPv4/IPv6 proxies, they are authenticated as belonging to residential networks. This reduces the risk of blocking and increases trust from website security systems. At the same time, they provide the stability and consistency of datacenter IPs. This makes ISP ones highly relevant for scenarios where maximum anonymity, reliable access to websites, and multi-account management are required, without compromising speed or connection quality.
Let's look at the main advantages and disadvantages of this type of proxy server.
Pros:
Cons:
These are dynamic IP addresses assigned to real devices connected to the internet through regular ISPs. They route your connection through actual users’ resources, often provided voluntarily via special apps installed on partner devices. This ensures that such IP addresses are as close as possible to ordinary home users, providing them with a high trust score.
A key feature of residential intermediaries is their ability to automatically rotate IP addresses. The system can assign a new IP from the available pool at a specified interval or on each request. This is essential for large-scale tasks where it’s important to avoid bans and site-imposed limits.
Unlike datacenter or ISP ones, residential addresses aren’t tied to servers or corporate networks. Their traffic comes from genuine devices such as smartphones, laptops, or routers. As a result, they mimic real user behavior on target sites and platforms, which is critical for bypassing anti-bot protections and working with systems sensitive to abnormal traffic.
To better understand the specifics of using and applying residential proxies, here are their main advantages and disadvantages.
Pros:
Cons:
To make a balanced choice when selecting a proxy server, it’s important to consider not only the basic characteristics but also how each type performs under specific usage scenarios. This section provides a detailed comparison of ISP vs residential proxies across key metrics such as speed, anonymity, resistance to blocking, geotargeting, and more.
This approach helps determine which type will be most effective for your tasks—whether for data collection, automation, multi-profile work, or bypassing restrictions. Let’s analyze the main parameters.
Residential proxies vs ISP proxies support standard protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5, but note the following:
So, both types are similar in protocol support, but for tasks requiring maximum connection reliability, ISP proxies are the preferred choice.
ISP intermediaries demonstrate consistently high speeds thanks to their data center infrastructure. Performance here is almost unaffected by external factors.
Residential ones, on the other hand, largely depend on the quality of the end-user connection, through which traffic is routed. This can significantly lower performance during peak loads.
In terms of disguising as a real user:
For scenarios requiring maximum authenticity and bypassing security systems, residential proxies are the preferred choice.
Residential intermediaries are clear leaders by this criterion. Their sessions run through real devices with natural behavior, making the traffic almost indistinguishable from human activity. ISP ones, in turn, can demonstrate a profile close to real, but technically may still be recognized as connections using anonymization tools.
Key points:
For stable tasks with strict data transfer requirements, ISP are optimal. Where realism is critical, residential are the best fit.
ISP intermediaries deliver high throughput, making them suitable for parallel connections, bulk downloads, and high-intensity traffic.
Residential IPs are limited by the user’s physical internet connection and the bandwidth of their device, which can be a bottleneck in resource-demanding scenarios.
For tasks that require maximum throughput, residential proxies are not recommended. ISP ones are preferable.
Reliability is a strong point for ISP proxies since the IP address remains static and the connection is stable. With residential ones, there is a high risk of session interruption due to the donor device going offline or the IP address changing. For long-term or session-based tasks, ISP are more stable.
Both types allow you to choose the geographic location of your IP address, but it’s important to note:
As a result, residential proxies have a clear advantage in terms of geo-diversity.
Residential proxies support automatic IP rotation within a pool, which is convenient for handling mass traffic or scraping tasks.
Key advantages of IP rotation with this type:
ISP proxies provide fixed IP addresses, and rotation is only possible via specialized third-party tools or software capable of launching managed IP rotation within the provider’s network.
ISP intermediaries are significantly cheaper than residential ones, even for long-term rental. This is because their sales model is based on individual IPs – clients can buy exactly the number of IP addresses needed in a specific location.
Residential proxies are generally more expensive than almost all other types due to the complexity of the infrastructure, load balancing models, and sales mechanisms. As noted earlier, customers mostly buy traffic, not individual IPs, and then create proxy lists for particular GEOs for further configuration.
If your budget is limited, ISP proxies can be a more economical choice while maintaining high-quality interaction with web resources.
To help readers distinguish between ISP vs residential proxies more easily, it’s recommended to review the comparison table below.
Metric | ISP | Residential |
---|---|---|
Speed | High | Medium/unstable |
Privacy | High | High |
Real User Emulation | Yes, moderate | Yes, natural |
Protocol Support (HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5) | Yes | Yes |
Bandwidth | High | Depends on device |
Geotargeting | Medium geo selection | Maximum geo coverage |
Rotation | No | Yes, automatic |
Cost | Average | High |
When comparing ISP vs residential proxies and making a choice between them, it’s essential to consider the specific goals and requirements of your project.
If your main priority is stable connections, high bandwidth, and low cost, ISP proxies are generally the preferred choice. They are ideal for scenarios involving intensive traffic and continuous sessions, where reliability is critical. This makes them suitable for managing large numbers of accounts on social networks, automation tools, e-commerce platforms, or accessing services with high load requirements.
On the other hand, residential IP addresses are most effective when it’s crucial to appear as a real user. This is especially relevant for bypassing anti-bot systems, CAPTCHAs, and other protections. Residential proxies are chosen for marketplace scraping, competitor analysis, ad validation, testing geo-targeted interfaces, and collecting localized data.
Below are several concrete use cases where these types are applied:
From this, it’s clear that these types do not compete directly but rather complement each other – each is optimal in its own context. By focusing on the project’s objectives, you can determine which type will deliver the best results. In most cases, users will be able to buy proxies that best match the requirements of a specific task.
If users have questions about choosing between paid or free proxies, it’s important to remember that free solutions usually have limitations in terms of stability and security. For serious projects, investing in quality solutions is the key to reliable access and effective data collection.
When choosing between ISP vs residential proxies, it is crucial to focus on specific use cases. For stable sessions, high speeds, and long-term processes, ISP intermediaries are the better choice. In situations where bypassing anti-bot systems, geotargeting, and emulating real user behavior is essential, residential ones are the preferred solution.
Regardless of the type, they should only be purchased from reliable and trusted providers. Private solutions offer better control over IP quality, access to technical support, and a higher level of security compared to public free alternatives.
A rational approach to selecting and using high-quality proxies is the key to efficiency, anonymity, and uninterrupted operation in any field that requires traffic masking and secure digital operations.